Michigan Estate Planning Blog

What Do I Need to Know If I’m Getting an Inheritance?

 

Kiplinger’s recent article entitled “Getting an Inheritance? Here Are 4 Things to Consider” says you can’t always know exactly what’s left in a will. However, if you’ve received or anticipate receiving some type of inheritance, there are a few things to consider that can help you prepare for the issues heirs face.
1. Expect the Process to Take Time. Settling an estate is a big task. When the decedent’s affairs aren’t in order, it’s an even greater task. The executor (the person appointed to administer the will) must notify beneficiaries and interested parties, pay outstanding debts, close accounts, take an inventory of assets and determine if any of the assets not part of the will must go through probate. They must file with the IRS to pay taxes. After this, the assets finally can be distributed to close the estate.
2. Create a Plan for the Money. This is an opportunity to put the money toward some practicalities, including ways to help protect your future. Think about building up your emergency fund, paying off high-interest debt and saving for long-term goals. After you address your financial priorities, it’s fine to begin thinking about spending the money on something fun.
3. Get Advice from an Experienced Estate Planning Attorney. The rules on inheriting assets can be complex, like when inheritors may have what’s called a step-up-in-basis provision for taxes. This lets the heirs set the valuation of their inherited property equal to its fair market value at the date of death – instead of the lower price at which it was purchased. This helps minimize capital gains taxes on inherited assets that have appreciated over time. There may also be state estate and inheritance taxes to consider.
4. Take Time to Review Your Own Estate Plan. Make your own estate administration as easy as possible after you are gone. This includes keeping clear records of all your accounts, along with any estate plan documents including trusts, wills, powers of attorney and advance health care directives. You should keep them all in a location accessible to those responsible for administering your estate.
Reference: Kiplinger (Jan. 9, 2023) “Getting an Inheritance? Here Are 4 Things to Consider”

Reducing Taxes By Minding Your Cost Basis

Investing and taxation can be tricky things, especially if you have been investing for some time. This can get even trickier when you transfer assets to loved ones or contemplate doing so. Taxation hinges on a few fundamental numbers, one of which is the cost basis. Given some interesting changes to the law governing cost basis, you may need to rethink your plans. If you have investment accounts, then you likely are aware of some of the changes that have begun to take effect and will continue to roll out through 2013. One of the most obvious changes was recently addressed in a Morningstar article titled “Beware the Default Method for Cost-Basis Elections.” Are you aware of the difference between the old style of cost basis election and the new possibilities your brokerage firm or mutual fund company can offer? Essentially, the old system of electing a cost basis was typically in the hands of the investor since they had to track and record their own cost basis on various investments. This meant averaging out the cost basis when selling various stocks at tax time. Now the cost basis is directly reported to the IRS from the firm/broker. Companies tend to offer the default means of reporting, but since information is going directly to the IRS, this also means there is enough information for specific-share identification in the cost basis election. The Morningstar article offers some interesting math to support why this actually can be advantageous for the crafty planner. The bottom line is that any trimming you can safely accomplish can secure more favorable capital gains taxation. Why? Because this cost basis carries over into another magic taxation number, the stepped-up basis, when investment assets are transferred. In short, small numerical changes add up and may affect your overall wealth-transfer planning.

Reference: Morningstar (March 26, 2012) “Beware the Default Method for Cost-Basis Elections”

ESTATE TAX FILING FOR 2010 – DEADLINE EXTENDED

If your last name is “Steinbrenner,” or you also are the heir to the estate of a decedent who passed in 2010, then you likely know that your assets stand at a crossroads and that the estate executor has a huge choice: to file for the estate tax or not to file? That, is the question. Formerly, the deadline was November 15, 2011, only a couple weeks out. Good news: Now, the deadline has been extended out to January 17, 2012. So, why is there even a choice to file an estate tax return anyway and why might it be a difficult choice? It exists, as you may know, because last December’s budget compromise created an estate tax for the year in which there wasn’t any estate tax. The move was to offer a “retroactive” estate tax to cover up the hole Congress had previously left open by allowing the 2010 tax to lapse. Of course, practically speaking anyway, it still doesn’t sound like a choice was created because, well, who would choose the estate tax? Indeed, there is a reason to choose the estate tax, but it depends entirely on the nature of the assets in the estate because of the “carryover basis” versus the “stepped-up basis” dilemma. If you choose not to pay the estate tax, then it catches up to you in the form of capital gains taxes upon the eventual sale of those assets. This is because the IRS will use the “carryover basis” or the original cost of the assets when determining capital gains. Assets that have significantly appreciated, or assets for which you cannot prove an original value, can become liabilities if you also plan to sell them. On the other hand, if you chose to pay the tax (35% on assets in excess of $5 million) then the IRS will use the “stepped-up basis” or current market value when determining the capital gains tax owed. More advice and information can be found in Deborah Jacobs’s recent article (as well as in an earlier New York Times piece), but so much depends on the particular assets and record-keeping abilities of the estate. Bottom line: As with any estate tax planning, make sure you consult with competent legal counsel, especially well before the clock runs out on January 17, 2012. In such instances, it may be prudent to file the estate tax return since you won’t pay taxes, but the rest involve a difficult calculation.

Reference: Forbes (September 13, 2011) “IRS Extends Key Deadline for 2010 Heirs”

ESTATE TAX FILING FOR 2010 – DEADLINE EXTENDED

If your last name is “Steinbrenner,” or you also are the heir to the estate of a decedent who passed in 2010, then you likely know that your assets stand at a crossroads and that the estate executor has a huge choice: to file for the estate tax or not to file? That, is the question. Formerly, the deadline was November 15, 2011, only a couple weeks out. Good news: Now, the deadline has been extended out to January 17, 2012. So, why is there even a choice to file an estate tax return anyway and why might it be a difficult choice? It exists, as you may know, because last December’s budget compromise created an estate tax for the year in which there wasn’t any estate tax. The move was to offer a “retroactive” estate tax to cover up the hole Congress had previously left open by allowing the 2010 tax to lapse. Of course, practically speaking anyway, it still doesn’t sound like a choice was created because, well, who would choose the estate tax? Indeed, there is a reason to choose the estate tax, but it depends entirely on the nature of the assets in the estate because of the “carryover basis” versus the “stepped-up basis” dilemma. If you choose not to pay the estate tax, then it catches up to you in the form of capital gains taxes upon the eventual sale of those assets. This is because the IRS will use the “carryover basis” or the original cost of the assets when determining capital gains. Assets that have significantly appreciated, or assets for which you cannot prove an original value, can become liabilities if you also plan to sell them. On the other hand, if you chose to pay the tax (35% on assets in excess of $5 million) then the IRS will use the “stepped-up basis” or current market value when determining the capital gains tax owed. More advice and information can be found in Deborah Jacobs’s recent article (as well as in an earlier New York Times piece), but so much depends on the particular assets and record-keeping abilities of the estate. Bottom line: As with any estate tax planning, make sure you consult with competent legal counsel, especially well before the clock runs out on January 17, 2012. In such instances, it may be prudent to file the estate tax return since you won’t pay taxes, but the rest involve a difficult calculation. You can learn more about estate taxes on the Estate Tax Practice Center on our website.

Reference: Forbes (September 13, 2011) “IRS Extends Key Deadline for 2010 Heirs”

Debt Deal is a Mixed Bag for Older Americans

For months we’ve been on the edge of our seats trying to figure out what Congress would do about the debt ceiling, and how their actions would affect the nation’s seniors. Finally, we can all breathe a quick sigh of relief … then go back to waiting. The recent debt deal did not raise taxes and it did not make the threatened cuts to Social Security or Medicare, but it does lay the groundwork for renewed discussion in the future. The AARP says the deal is mixed bag for older Americans, but not as bad as it might have been. Proposed cuts to Social Security and Medicare did not make it into the final bill. Of note, too, is that the proposed changes for calculating the Social Security Cost Of Living Adjustment (COLA) – a less generous formula that effectively cuts the benefit – did not make it into the final bill either. But in order to preserve these programs many other programs were slashed, including those emphasizing nutrition, senior job placement, and home and heating assistance. Nevertheless, the debt discussion was not put to rest, merely put on hold. One of the biggest results of the law is to create a congressional super-committee of six Democrats and six Republicans who must make significant budgetary recommendations by late November. By Christmas-time this year, Congress must act on these recommendations, or find a better solution, or else severe cuts will go into effect across both military and entitlements spending like Medicare and Social Security. For now, seniors can breathe a bit easier. But, clearly, the debt crisis has been postponed rather than resolved.

Reference: AARP (August 2, 2011) “Debt Deal: No New Taxes and No Social Security or Medicare Cuts – Yet

ESTATE TAX FILING FOR 2010 – DEADLINE EXTENDED

If your last name is “Steinbrenner,” or you also are the heir to the estate of a decedent who passed in 2010, then you likely know that your assets stand at a crossroads and that the estate executor has a huge choice: to file for the estate tax or not to file? That, is the question. Formerly, the deadline was November 15, 2011, only a couple weeks out. Good news: Now, the deadline has been extended out to January 17, 2012. So, why is there even a choice to file an estate tax return anyway and why might it be a difficult choice? It exists, as you may know, because last December’s budget compromise created an estate tax for the year in which there wasn’t any estate tax. The move was to offer a “retroactive” estate tax to cover up the hole Congress had previously left open by allowing the 2010 tax to lapse. Of course, practically speaking anyway, it still doesn’t sound like a choice was created because, well, who would choose the estate tax? Indeed, there is a reason to choose the estate tax, but it depends entirely on the nature of the assets in the estate because of the “carryover basis” versus the “stepped-up basis” dilemma. If you choose not to pay the estate tax, then it catches up to you in the form of capital gains taxes upon the eventual sale of those assets. This is because the IRS will use the “carryover basis” or the original cost of the assets when determining capital gains. Assets that have significantly appreciated, or assets for which you cannot prove an original value, can become liabilities if you also plan to sell them. On the other hand, if you chose to pay the tax (35% on assets in excess of $5 million) then the IRS will use the “stepped-up basis” or current market value when determining the capital gains tax owed. More advice and information can be found in Deborah Jacobs’s recent article (as well as in an earlier New York Times piece), but so much depends on the particular assets and record-keeping abilities of the estate. Bottom line: As with any estate tax planning, make sure you consult with competent legal counsel, especially well before the clock runs out on January 17, 2012. In such instances, it may be prudent to file the estate tax return since you won’t pay taxes, but the rest involve a difficult calculation. You can learn more about estate taxes on the Estate Tax Practice Center on our website.

Reference: Forbes (September 13, 2011) “IRS Extends Key Deadline for 2010 Heirs