Planning your estate may seem like a simple matter of deciding who gets your stuff when you’re gone. What if you are a person of great faith and religious conviction? How does a person of faith plan for his or her estate when life (and especially life beyond) is so much more than mere “stuff”? The problem of mixing religion and estate planning – that is, the problem of doing it well – is a issue taken up by the Wall Street Journal in an article titled Joining Church and Estate. If your decisions during life are guided by your faith, then likely your estate decisions will be too. For example, end-of-life, disposition of remains and even charitable giving decisions are oftentimes determined by ones religious beliefs. These are personal decisions that directly impact you and collaterally impact others. However, an entirely different matter, and one that can be the source of much trouble, are the religiously motivated decisions you may make in regards to others. Given the numerous alternative planning strategies and tools available to plan your estate, it is possible to make (or attempt to make) religious decisions for your heirs. This is where problems can arise. In the extreme, you can move beyond encouraging to requiring the observance of certain religious principles, rituals, or lifelong membership in the given religion to secure any inheritance. As the Wall Street Journal article illustrates, this is where problems can arise. In short, requiring heirs to uphold religious principles they do not share can work to undermine them. The article discusses some particularly poignant examples, and real life court battles, but as a general principle it may be worth avoiding this type of planning.
Reference: The Wall Street Journal (April 30, 2012) “Joining Church and Estate”